Comparative study between mobile infrared optoelectronic volumetry with a Perometer and two commonly used methods for the evaluation of arm volume in patients with breast cancer related lymphedema of the arm.
Identifieur interne : 003783 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 003782; suivant : 003784Comparative study between mobile infrared optoelectronic volumetry with a Perometer and two commonly used methods for the evaluation of arm volume in patients with breast cancer related lymphedema of the arm.
Auteurs : N. Adriaenssens ; R. Buyl ; P. Lievens ; C. Fontaine ; J. LamoteSource :
- Lymphology [ 0024-7766 ] ; 2013.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Anthropométrie (), Anthropométrie (instrumentation), Bras (anatomopathologie), Femelle, Humains, Lymphoedème (anatomopathologie), Lymphoedème (étiologie), Pronostic, Rayons infrarouges, Stade de la tumeur, Tumeurs du sein (), Tumeurs du sein (anatomopathologie), Études cas-témoins, Études de suivi.
- MESH :
- anatomopathologie : Bras, Lymphoedème, Tumeurs du sein.
- étiologie : Anthropométrie, Lymphoedème.
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Anthropométrie, Femelle, Humains, Pronostic, Rayons infrarouges, Stade de la tumeur, Tumeurs du sein, Études cas-témoins, Études de suivi.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Anthropometry (instrumentation), Anthropometry (methods), Arm (pathology), Breast Neoplasms (complications), Breast Neoplasms (pathology), Case-Control Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Infrared Rays, Lymphedema (etiology), Lymphedema (pathology), Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Prognosis.
- MESH :
- complications : Breast Neoplasms.
- etiology : Lymphedema.
- instrumentation : Anthropometry.
- methods : Anthropometry.
- pathology : Arm, Breast Neoplasms, Lymphedema.
- Adult, Case-Control Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Infrared Rays, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Prognosis.
Abstract
There is no consensus on the definition of Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema of the arm (BCRL) because there are no agreed standards in measurement methods and diagnostic criteria. The main objective of this study is to compare mobile infrared optoelectronic volumetry with a Perometer with two commonly used methods for the evaluation of arm volume in patients with different degrees of BCRL. Bilateral arm volumes of eighty participants, with and without clinical BCRL, were calculated with a mobile Perometer, by water displacement, and with circumferential measurements, integrated in the frustrum, single frustrum, and disc model method. The ICC of the Perometer was between 0.997 and 0.999. The frustrum and disc model method produced the largest volume measurements and water displacement the smallest, while Perometer measures were in between. On average, volume of the dominant arm was found to be 2.2% higher than the non-dominant arm in the healthy control group, cautioning for intra- patient differences between both arms when comparing ipsilateral to contralateral arm for the diagnosis of BCRL with a threshold value. Future research would likely benefit from the use of the Perometer compared to the other arm volume evaluation tools for BCRL, and further, the single frustrum method should not be used for volume estimations of edematous arms.
PubMed: 24645536
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: 001613
- to stream PubMed, to step Curation: 001613
- to stream PubMed, to step Checkpoint: 001613
- to stream Ncbi, to step Merge: 006439
- to stream Ncbi, to step Curation: 006439
- to stream Ncbi, to step Checkpoint: 006439
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 003791
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 003783
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Comparative study between mobile infrared optoelectronic volumetry with a Perometer and two commonly used methods for the evaluation of arm volume in patients with breast cancer related lymphedema of the arm.</title><author><name sortKey="Adriaenssens, N" sort="Adriaenssens, N" uniqKey="Adriaenssens N" first="N" last="Adriaenssens">N. Adriaenssens</name></author><author><name sortKey="Buyl, R" sort="Buyl, R" uniqKey="Buyl R" first="R" last="Buyl">R. Buyl</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lievens, P" sort="Lievens, P" uniqKey="Lievens P" first="P" last="Lievens">P. Lievens</name></author><author><name sortKey="Fontaine, C" sort="Fontaine, C" uniqKey="Fontaine C" first="C" last="Fontaine">C. Fontaine</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lamote, J" sort="Lamote, J" uniqKey="Lamote J" first="J" last="Lamote">J. Lamote</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2013">2013</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:24645536</idno><idno type="pmid">24645536</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001613</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001613</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">001613</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">001613</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">001613</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">001613</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">006439</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">006439</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">006439</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0024-7766:2013:Adriaenssens N:comparative:study:between</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">003791</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">003783</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">003783</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Comparative study between mobile infrared optoelectronic volumetry with a Perometer and two commonly used methods for the evaluation of arm volume in patients with breast cancer related lymphedema of the arm.</title><author><name sortKey="Adriaenssens, N" sort="Adriaenssens, N" uniqKey="Adriaenssens N" first="N" last="Adriaenssens">N. Adriaenssens</name></author><author><name sortKey="Buyl, R" sort="Buyl, R" uniqKey="Buyl R" first="R" last="Buyl">R. Buyl</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lievens, P" sort="Lievens, P" uniqKey="Lievens P" first="P" last="Lievens">P. Lievens</name></author><author><name sortKey="Fontaine, C" sort="Fontaine, C" uniqKey="Fontaine C" first="C" last="Fontaine">C. Fontaine</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lamote, J" sort="Lamote, J" uniqKey="Lamote J" first="J" last="Lamote">J. Lamote</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Lymphology</title><idno type="ISSN">0024-7766</idno><imprint><date when="2013" type="published">2013</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Anthropometry (instrumentation)</term><term>Anthropometry (methods)</term><term>Arm (pathology)</term><term>Breast Neoplasms (complications)</term><term>Breast Neoplasms (pathology)</term><term>Case-Control Studies</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Infrared Rays</term><term>Lymphedema (etiology)</term><term>Lymphedema (pathology)</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Neoplasm Staging</term><term>Prognosis</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Anthropométrie ()</term><term>Anthropométrie (instrumentation)</term><term>Bras (anatomopathologie)</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Lymphoedème (anatomopathologie)</term><term>Lymphoedème (étiologie)</term><term>Pronostic</term><term>Rayons infrarouges</term><term>Stade de la tumeur</term><term>Tumeurs du sein ()</term><term>Tumeurs du sein (anatomopathologie)</term><term>Études cas-témoins</term><term>Études de suivi</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="anatomopathologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Bras</term><term>Lymphoedème</term><term>Tumeurs du sein</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="complications" xml:lang="en"><term>Breast Neoplasms</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="etiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Lymphedema</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="en"><term>Anthropometry</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Anthropometry</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="pathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Arm</term><term>Breast Neoplasms</term><term>Lymphedema</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="étiologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Anthropométrie</term><term>Lymphoedème</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Case-Control Studies</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Infrared Rays</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Neoplasm Staging</term><term>Prognosis</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Anthropométrie</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Pronostic</term><term>Rayons infrarouges</term><term>Stade de la tumeur</term><term>Tumeurs du sein</term><term>Études cas-témoins</term><term>Études de suivi</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">There is no consensus on the definition of Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema of the arm (BCRL) because there are no agreed standards in measurement methods and diagnostic criteria. The main objective of this study is to compare mobile infrared optoelectronic volumetry with a Perometer with two commonly used methods for the evaluation of arm volume in patients with different degrees of BCRL. Bilateral arm volumes of eighty participants, with and without clinical BCRL, were calculated with a mobile Perometer, by water displacement, and with circumferential measurements, integrated in the frustrum, single frustrum, and disc model method. The ICC of the Perometer was between 0.997 and 0.999. The frustrum and disc model method produced the largest volume measurements and water displacement the smallest, while Perometer measures were in between. On average, volume of the dominant arm was found to be 2.2% higher than the non-dominant arm in the healthy control group, cautioning for intra- patient differences between both arms when comparing ipsilateral to contralateral arm for the diagnosis of BCRL with a threshold value. Future research would likely benefit from the use of the Perometer compared to the other arm volume evaluation tools for BCRL, and further, the single frustrum method should not be used for volume estimations of edematous arms.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Adriaenssens, N" sort="Adriaenssens, N" uniqKey="Adriaenssens N" first="N" last="Adriaenssens">N. Adriaenssens</name><name sortKey="Buyl, R" sort="Buyl, R" uniqKey="Buyl R" first="R" last="Buyl">R. Buyl</name><name sortKey="Fontaine, C" sort="Fontaine, C" uniqKey="Fontaine C" first="C" last="Fontaine">C. Fontaine</name><name sortKey="Lamote, J" sort="Lamote, J" uniqKey="Lamote J" first="J" last="Lamote">J. Lamote</name><name sortKey="Lievens, P" sort="Lievens, P" uniqKey="Lievens P" first="P" last="Lievens">P. Lievens</name></noCountry></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/LymphedemaV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003783 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 003783 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Sante
|area= LymphedemaV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:24645536
|texte= Comparative study between mobile infrared optoelectronic volumetry with a Perometer and two commonly used methods for the evaluation of arm volume in patients with breast cancer related lymphedema of the arm.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:24645536" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a LymphedemaV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |